Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Chris Radlick, United States of America v. George Henry Willers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1978No. 76-3222, 76-2882PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, District Judge:

Appellants were convicted, after jury trial, of conspiracy to manufacture phencycli-dine (PCP) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

In December, 1975, California narcotics agents were alerted by officials of & San Luis Obispo chemical company tliat appellant Radlick had telephoned to/place an order for 510 kilograms (about 1420 pounds) of piperidine, a precursor ou PCP. The officials had known Radlick when he was a chemistry professor at a California university and they knew that he had resigned that post to take a position with a large pharmaceutical firm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Martin F. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Dwight ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Jessie Lee TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. State v. WilmothOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API