Tatterson v. Koppers Co., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether or not the exhaustion doctrine should be applied in this Commonwealth to disputes involving the administration of a company-sponsored retirement plan established under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 1 Specifically, we here consider whether a former employee who claims he is not receiving the amount of retirement benefits to which he believes himself to be entitled under the employer’s retirement plan must appeal the denial of his request for further benefits to the employer’s pension committee before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Edward A. Challenger v. Local Union No. 1 of the International Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental Ironworkers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nobers v. Crucible, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Pilieri v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Estate of: Gallagher, S. Appeal of: Hallman, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015