Legal Opinion
City of Port Arthur v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 2, 2000No. 03-99-00743-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARILYN ABOUSSIE, Chief Justice.
Appellant, the City of Port Arthur (the City), appeals the district court’s striking of its plea in intervention. We will affirm.
Background
On December 18, 1997, appellee Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWB) filed an application for rate group reclassification with appellee Public Utility Commission (the Commission). The application was referred to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for a hearing before an administrative law judge. 1 The hearing was held in September 1998, and the judge issued a proposed decision on November 17, 1998. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Proctor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Texas High-Speed Rail AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Mendez v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Creedmoor-Maha Water Supply Corp. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Friends of Canyon Lake, Inc. v. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Coastal Habitat Alliance v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Ex parte SpringsteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Story, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.