Creedmoor-Maha Water Supply Corp. v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
The Creedmoor-Maha Water Supply Corporation (Creedmoor) appeals a district court judgment dismissing, for want of subject-matter jurisdiction, claims for declaratory and injunctive relief through which it seeks to challenge a final order of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). In a single issue, Creedmoor asserts that the district court erred in dismissing its claims. We disagree and will affirm the district court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Appellant Creedmoor is a non-profit, member-owned water supply corporation (WSC) that provides water utility…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Wallace L. Hall, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Regent for the University of Texas System v. William H. McRaven, in His Official Capacity as Chancellor for the University of Texas SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re Sustainable Texas Oyster Resource Management, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- Green Valley Special Util Dist v. Donna Nelson, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Stanley Bacon, Jr. v. Texas Historical Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- Texas Department of Transportation v. Sunset Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.