Legal Opinion

Henry Bickel Co. v. National Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 8, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Affirming.

E. A. Barker and Son were the contractors for the construction of section B of the northwestern sewer in Louisville under a contract with the commissioners of sewerage; and the National Surety Company was the surety of Barker and Son on a bond executed to the commissioners of sewerage, conditioned for the faithful performance of the contract, and “to save and protect the said commissioners of sewerage of the city of Louisville, Kentucky, and any person furnishing materials in the prosecution .of said work from any loss or damage by reason…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Allen v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Basshor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Avery & Sons v. Woodruff & CahillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Carson & Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. D. H. Overmyer Warehouse Co. v. W. C. Caye & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Steele & Lebby v. Flynn-Sullivan Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Century Indemnity Co. v. Shunk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Bond v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API