Robinson v. Wiley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill of interpleader, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court on November 5, 1893, by the surviving partner of the law firm of Blaney and Robinson, who acted as counsel for the plaintiff in the case of Wiley v. Bunker Hill National Bank, reported in 183 Mass. 495, to determine whether the money recovered in that action should be paid to the defendant Wiley, the plaintiff in that action, or to the defendants Bullard and Wild, assignees under a common law assignment for the…
Read the full summary
Bill of interpleader, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court on November 5, 1893, by the surviving partner of the law firm of Blaney and Robinson, who acted as counsel for the plaintiff in the case of Wiley v. Bunker Hill National Bank, reported in 183 Mass. 495, to determine whether the money recovered in that action should be paid to the defendant Wiley, the plaintiff in that action, or to the defendants Bullard and Wild, assignees under a common law assignment for the benefit of creditors made by tbe defendant Wiley on February 21, 1898, the above named action having been begun on' February…
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The fund in the possession of the plaintiff is the avails of the judgment recovered in Wiley v. Bunker Hill National Bank, 183 Mass. 495. It belongs to the plaintiff in that action, who is a claimant here, unless under the assignment made by him for the benefit of his creditors his title passed to the assignees, who began and prosecuted the action. In the granting part of the instrument he conveys to them “ all his . . . property and choses in action of every name, nature and description .. . . except such property only as is exempt by law from ¡attachment.”
The language employed is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Moore v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Wiley v. Bunker Hill National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Heath v. New Bedford Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Linton v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Zinc Companies v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Raymer v. Bay State National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Bethlehem Fabricators, Inc. v. H. D. Watts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Flynn v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.