Thurber v. . Harlem B., M. F.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
There having been no appeal from the Special to the General Term of the Supreme Court from the order denying the motion for a new trial, the court, at General Term, had jurisdiction only of the appeal from the judgment. The order refusing a new trial was not before the court, and reviewable as an intermediate order involving the merits, and necessarily affecting the judgment within section 11, subsection 2 of the Code.
Errors of law alone, arising upon exceptions taken upon the trial, were, therefore, before the Supreme Court, and proper causes for reversing the judgment and granting a new…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hartfield v. RoperNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Ihl v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Birge v. GardinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Burger v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Townley v. Chicago, MilwauKee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Schmitz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Travell v. . BannermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.