Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Carr Bros.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 25, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, C. J.
In this proceeding the plaintiff, Ansel Higgins, sues his employer, Carr Brothers Company, for unpaid wages and overtime compensation alleged to be due him with liquidated damages for the period from October 24, 1938, to July 24, 1940, under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52. Stat. 1060; U. S. C. A. Tit. 29, Chap. 8. The plea was the *266general issue with a brief statement denying that the employer and employee were engaged in interstate commerce at the time embraced in the declaration and that the Fair Labor Standards Act had been violated. By consent of the parties the case was heard by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walling v. Consumers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Duncan v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
- Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- George P. Shultz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. National Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Squires v. Inhabitants of City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.