Legal Opinion

Dayton Arcade Co. v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

The plaintiff in error, the Dayton Arcade Company, defendant below, prosecutes error to the judgment of the court of common pleas. The parties will be referred to as they stood in the court below.

The plaintiff, Bessie M. Miller, brought suit in the court of common pleas for damages caused by negligence. The defendant, the Dayton Arcade Company, owned an apartment building on Fourth street, in the city of Dayton. In this building there was an elevator which opened into a court leading south to Fourth street, and leading north into an arcade, also owned by the defendant, immediately north of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union News Co. v. FreebornOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Highway Construction Co. v. SornaOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. SaxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. The Harmony Realty Co. v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. ReddOhio Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dayton Arcade Co. v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API