Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Winfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1974No. 1-973A158PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.

— Defendants-appellants Carl E. Pearson, Mary Ann Pearson, and Olive C. Beem appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs-appellees William S. and Douglass E. Winfield in an action for reformation of a deed.

The central issue presented for review is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding of mutual mistake and its subsequent grant of reformation.

The following facts are pertinent to this appeal:

In November, 1959, defendant-appellant Olive C. Beem negotiated a sale of certain of her real estate in Monroe County with plaintiff-appellee William Winfield. They agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Estate of Barnett v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Plumlee v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Helen C. Holtz v. J.J.B. Hilliard W.L. Lyons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Kruse, Kruse & Miklosko, Inc. v. BeedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Plaza Realty Investors v. BaileyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API