Legal Opinion
O'Sullivan v. Rivera
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided September 17, 2004No. CIV 03-1402 JB/LFGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Physical Examination of Plaintiff Brendan T. O’Sullivan, filed August 23, 2004 (Doc. 20). The primary issue is whether the Court should order, under rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the medical examination of the Plaintiff, Brendan T. O’Sullivan, by an expert of the Defendants’ choosing. Because O’Sullivan’s health is at issue, and because the Defendants have shown good cause for the examination, the Court will allow the Defendants’ expert to examine O’Sullivan.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Simpson v. University of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Scott v. Spanjer Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The Guilford National Bank of Greensboro, Administrator C.T.A., D.B.N., of the Estate of Joseph M. Coble, Deceased v. Southern Railway Company, and Third-Party v. Garland Batchelor, of the Estate of Annie J. Coble, Deceased, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering DivisionTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- (PC) Witkin v. LotersztainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering DivisionTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Booker v. P.A.M. Transport Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
- Booker v. P.A.M. Transport Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.