Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Bagley & Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 29, 2011No. 20090433-CAPublished

1DissentDavis, Presiding Judge

{16 The lead opinion recognizes the rule that a trial court is constrained to implement the spirit, and not only the letter, of our prior mandate. See supra 15 (citing Utah Dep't of Transp. v. Ivers, 2009 UT 56, ¶ 12, 218 P.3d 583). However, in assessing whether the trial court correctly implemented our prior mandate, the lead opinion does exactly the opposite, essentially focusing only on form and not on substance. : This elevation of form over substance results in an outcome contrary to that intended in our prior opinion and is manifestly unjust. I therefore do not join the lead opinion and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Levy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Utah Department of Transportation v. IversUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API