Legal Opinion

Hap Corporation v. Heyman Manufacturing Company, Heyman Manufacturing Company v. Hap Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 12, 1966No. 6656, 6665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

This is the second time that this patent case is before us. See Hap Corp. v. Heyman Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 1962, 311 F.2d 839, cert. den. 373 U.S. 903, 83 S.Ct. 1290, 10 L.Ed.2d 198. The present cross appeals follow the confirmation of a master’s report determining the damages for infringement of the two patents, Nos. 2,191,384 and ’385, that remained open after our earlier decision. Briefly, Hap, the successful plaintiff in counterclaim, asserts that the master took too narrow a view of the scope of the patents, and erroneously failed to find that certain articles infringed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David Chernack v. Gilbert RadloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  2. Hap Corporation v. Heyman Manufacturing Company, Heyman Manufacturing Company v. Hap CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  3. Union Electric Welding Co. v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. L. S. Starrett Co. v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryce Beattie v. Frances W. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. City of Dallas, Texas v. RentzelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API