Prieto v. May Department Stores Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff, now appellant, brought this action against a department store and its store detective for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. On consideration of the depositions of plaintiff, the detective, and another store employee, the trial court granted summary judgment against plaintiff. She has appealed.
In the light most favorable to plaintiff, the following facts appear uncontradicted. Plaintiff, a native of Cuba with a limited command of English, entered the store’s basement department shortly before the closing hour to purchase a pair of pajamas.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Teel v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Wolter v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Carroll v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Weisman v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. KellyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Shaw v. May Department Stores Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.