Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Murdock Acceptance Corporation

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1957No. 5-1243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This case began as an effort by the appellant, Griffin, to avoid a note on the ground of usury. On March 19, 1955, Griffin purchased a new Rambler Hudson station wagon from Kelly Motors, Inc. of Little Rock, and. executed a title retaining note for $2,396.70, as explained hereinafter. Kelly Motors, Inc, immediately transferred the note to Murdock Acceptance Corporation. The note and title retaining contract were on forms furnished by Murdock Acceptance Corporation (hereinafter called “Murdock”); so, under our holding in the Hare case, 1 we treat Murdock as having been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Whiddon v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. American National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Hot Springs Concrete Co. v. RosamondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Winkle v. Grand National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Brooks v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. LackeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Monclova v. Financial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CatalaniSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API