Lanier v. Suttles
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
1. A statute is presumed to' be valid and constitutional until the contrary appears. Mayes v. Daniel, 186 Ga. 345 (1) (198 S. E. 535). In order to raise a question as to the constitutionality of a “law” (Code, Ann., § 2-3704), the statute which the party challenges, and the provision of the Constitution alleged to have been violated, must both be clearly specified, and it must also be shown wherein the statute violates such constitutional provision. Krasner v. Rutledge, 204 Ga. 380, 382 (49 S. E. 2d 864), and cases cited; Flynn v. State, 209 Ga. 519, 521 (74 S. E. 2d 461).
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mayes v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Waycross Military Association v. HiersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Flynn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Krasner v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Chadwick v. DolinoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prince v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Waters v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Irwin County Electric Membership Corp. v. HaddockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972