Legal Opinion
Krasner v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 13, 1948No. 16326PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant demurred on the grounds (1-3) that the petition fails to set forth a cause of action, legal or constitutional, and fails to set forth any constitutional act or acts of Congress under which the action could be brought, or legally pursued.
The Housing and Rent Act of 1947, amending the Emergency , Price Control Act of 1942 (50 U. S. C. A. App., § 901 et seq.) as amended, declares in part: “Sec. 205. Any person who demands, accepts, or receives any payment of rent in excess of the maximum rent prescribed under section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Dade County v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Staub v. City of BaxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Franklin v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Williams v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Adams v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.