Legal Opinion
Shore West Construction Co. v. Sroka
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1991No. Nos. 90-373 and 90-681PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Upon review, we hold that a loan obtained for purposes of purchasing real estate may be a “consumer loan” under R.C. 2323.13(E)(1).
R.C. 2323.13(E) states in pertinent part:
“A warrant of attorney to confess judgment * * *, arising out of a consumer loan or consumer transaction, is invalid and the court shall have no jurisdiction to render a judgment based upon such a warrant. * * *
<< * * *
“As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Consumer loan’ means a loan to a natural person and the debt incurred is primarily for a personal, family, educational, or household purpose. The term ‘consumer loan’ includes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Heritage Hills, Ltd. v. DeaconOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ohio Savings Assn. v. CortellOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Vroman v. HalishakOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- Huntington National Bank v. Burda, 08ap-658 (4-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- Advanced Clinical v. Salem Chiropractic, Unpublished Decision (1-12-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rose v. Zaring Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- 1st Natl. Fin. Servs. v. AshleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.