Legal Opinion

Shore West Construction Co. v. Sroka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1991No. Nos. 90-373 and 90-681PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Upon review, we hold that a loan obtained for purposes of purchasing real estate may be a “consumer loan” under R.C. 2323.13(E)(1).

R.C. 2323.13(E) states in pertinent part:

“A warrant of attorney to confess judgment * * *, arising out of a consumer loan or consumer transaction, is invalid and the court shall have no jurisdiction to render a judgment based upon such a warrant. * * *

<< * * *

“As used in this section:
“(1) ‘Consumer loan’ means a loan to a natural person and the debt incurred is primarily for a personal, family, educational, or household purpose. The term ‘consumer loan’ includes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Heritage Hills, Ltd. v. DeaconOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ohio Savings Assn. v. CortellOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Vroman v. HalishakOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. Burda, 08ap-658 (4-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Advanced Clinical v. Salem Chiropractic, Unpublished Decision (1-12-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Rose v. Zaring Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. 1st Natl. Fin. Servs. v. AshleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API