Legal Opinion

Spray Drift Task Force v. Burlington Bio-Medical Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 16, 2006No. Civ.A. 05-1726(JGP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Petition of Claimant Spray Drift Task Force (“Spray Drift”) to Confirm Arbitration Award [1], the Opposition of Defendant Burlington Bio-Medical Corporation (“Burlington”) [6], and Spray Drift’s Reply [8]. 1 Spray Drift seeks a judgment con firming an August 24, 2005 arbitration award (“Award”) and authorizing immediate registration of that judgment in other U.S. District Courts for purposes of execution. Upon consideration of those filings and the entire record in this matter, the Court finds that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheminova A/S v. Griffin L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Associated Business Telephone Systems Corp. v. Greater Capital Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  3. Johns v. RozetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  4. Educational Employees Credit Union v. Mutual Guaranty Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chevron Corporation v. Republic of EcuadorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Non-Dietary Exposure Task Force v. Tagros Chemicals India, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Cianbro Corp. v. GEORGE H. DEAN, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
  4. Bavelis v. DoukasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. Med-Trans Corporation v. Capital Health Plan, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API