Legal Opinion
AT/COMM, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided October 15, 1995No. 955188PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.
This claim arises out of a dispute over a request for proposals (“RFP”) for an electronic toll collection and management system (“ETTM”) put out by the defendant, Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (“MassPike”). Plaintiff AT/Comm, Inc. (“AT/Comm”) seeks a declaration that the RFP is invalid as it imper-missibly narrows common technical specifications for the ETTM, as set out in a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) among several state agencies, thereby violating Chapter 273, Section 87 of the Acts and Resolves of 1994 (“Section 87”). The plaintiff also seeks an injunction preventing MassPike…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Massachusetts Ass'n of Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amtech Systems Corp. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998