Legal Opinion

Leonhardt v. Small

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1906PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

The complainants, Lewis Leonhardt & Co., brought this suit against W. H. Small & Co., of Evansville, Indiana, the Fourth National Rank, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Mechanics’ National Bank, of Knoxville, Tennessee, to recover the sum of $300 damages for the breach of a contract which complainants made with W. H. Small & Co. to purchase from them ten car loads of No. 1 timothy hay. The facts reported by the court of chancery appeals are as follows:

The complainants, Lewis Leonhardt & Co.,.who reside in Knoxville, Tennessee, contracted to buy from W. H. Small & Co., who reside at Evansville,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Goetz v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. National Bank of Commerce of Boston v. Merchants' Nat. Bank of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mason v. A. E. Nelson Cotton Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hawkins v. Alfalfa Products Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Campbell v. Noble-Trotter Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Chase National Bank v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API