Legal Opinion

Stone v. Hurst Lumber Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1963No. 9879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

This appeal is brought by the Hurst Lumber Company, appellant herein, from an adverse jury verdict and judgment thereon in an action brought by Dyle E. Stone, respondent herein, for damages resulting from an assault and battery by an employee of the lumber company.

- From the evidence it appears that about 12 days before the incident, which is the basis of this suit, occurred, the lumber company, needing a deliveryman, called an employment agency from whom they had been accustomed for a number of years to secure applicants for employment. The employment agency sent a Mr. Marlin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. Modoc State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. La Lone v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Svacek v. ShelleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Barney v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Fleming v. BronfinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API