Legal Opinion

Combined Communications Corp. v. City of Bridgeton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1996No. 70528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, City of Bridgeton, appeals summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Gan-nett Outdoor Company, a division of Combined Communications Corporation, on Count I of its petition for injunction. Gan-nett challenged a Bridgeton Ordinance on three separate grounds. It alleged: (1) the Missouri Billboards Act, §§ 226.500 to 226.600, RSMo.Cum.Supp.1993 (the Act) preempts Bridgeton’s Ordinance as applied to billboards;1 (2) the Ordinance violates Article I, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; and (3) the Ordinance is prohibitive and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Leathers v. MedlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. 508 Chestnut, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. National Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Babb v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Moats v. Pulaski County Sewer District No. IMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API