Combined Communications Corp. v. City of Bridgeton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant, City of Bridgeton, appeals summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Gan-nett Outdoor Company, a division of Combined Communications Corporation, on Count I of its petition for injunction. Gan-nett challenged a Bridgeton Ordinance on three separate grounds. It alleged: (1) the Missouri Billboards Act, §§ 226.500 to 226.600, RSMo.Cum.Supp.1993 (the Act) preempts Bridgeton’s Ordinance as applied to billboards;1 (2) the Ordinance violates Article I, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution; and (3) the Ordinance is prohibitive and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leathers v. MedlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- 508 Chestnut, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- National Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wood v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Babb v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Moats v. Pulaski County Sewer District No. IMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.