Legal Opinion

Doe v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 1993No. 3-92-056-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

This case involves liability of an employer and a testing lab in connection with a pre-employment drug-screening test. Appellant, Jane Doe, the prospective employee, appeals from an adverse summary judgment. We will affirm the summary judgment in part and reverse and remand in part.

BACKGROUND

The Quaker Oats Company (“Quaker”) offered Doe, a Master of Business Administration student, a job as a marketing assistant in its Chicago office at a starting salary of $49,000 plus a bonus of $4,000. The offer did not state a definite term of employment. Quaker’s employment offer…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jeffrey M. Duffy v. Leading Edge Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sullivan v. Baptist Memorial HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Austin v. Inet Technologies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Estate of Martineau v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API