State v. Starkey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceHunter, Judge
I agree with the State that the trial court’s action in granting the motion for appropriate relief directly contradicts settled case law regarding Eighth Amendment challenges to habitual felon sentences and was therefore erroneous. See, e.g., State v. Todd, 313 N.C. 110, 117-19, 326 S.E.2d 249, 253-55 (1985); State v. McDonald, 165 N.C. App. 237, 241-42, 599 S.E.2d 50, 52-53, disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 195, 608 S.E.2d 60 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 988, 161 L. Ed. 2d 748 (2005); State v. Clifton, 158 N.C. App. 88, 95-96, 580 S.E.2d 40, 45-46, cert. denied, 357 N.C. 463, 586 S.E.2d 266…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.