Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Starkey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 2006No. COA05-1013Published

1ConcurrenceHunter, Judge

I agree with the State that the trial court’s action in granting the motion for appropriate relief directly contradicts settled case law regarding Eighth Amendment challenges to habitual felon sentences and was therefore erroneous. See, e.g., State v. Todd, 313 N.C. 110, 117-19, 326 S.E.2d 249, 253-55 (1985); State v. McDonald, 165 N.C. App. 237, 241-42, 599 S.E.2d 50, 52-53, disc. review denied, 359 N.C. 195, 608 S.E.2d 60 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 988, 161 L. Ed. 2d 748 (2005); State v. Clifton, 158 N.C. App. 88, 95-96, 580 S.E.2d 40, 45-46, cert. denied, 357 N.C. 463, 586 S.E.2d 266…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API