Legal Opinion

Westchester Fire Insurance v. Wagner & Chabot

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1895No. 599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. G. H. Noonan.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Appellees instituted this suit, and alleged in their petition that appellant had insured them in the sum of §2000 against loss from the destruction of a certain stock of goods that had been destroyed by fire; that the goods belonged to Kloak Bros. & Co., of Cincinnati, Ohio, and that appellees had been holding them on consignment and selling them in consideration of a certain per cent of the profits. It was also alleged, that the goods had been insured as the property of appellees, but that the agent of appellant had been informed, when the contract of insurance was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Lake Dallas Gin Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Terry v. Texas Prudential Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Roberts, Willis & Taylor Co. v. Sun Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Kasch v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. CablerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API