Legal Opinion

Meenan Oil Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Meenan Oil Company, L.P., (Employer) petitions for review of the September 5, 2003, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to grant three petitions filed by Richard Pownall (Claimant).1 In this case, we are asked to determine whether the WCJ, pursuant to section 413(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act2 (Act), properly amended a notice of compensation payable (NCP) to correct the date of injury and to include additional injuries.

The relevant facts are as follows. Claimant worked for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Golley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Borough of Honesdale v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Curran v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. D. Colagreco v. WCAB (Vanguard Group Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API