Legal Opinion

Stout v. Perry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Beaton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

— The appellees sued the appellant, to recover the value of a field of standing com, which they allege the appellant gathered, took away and appropriated to his own use. The appelleesjslaim by purchase under a sheriff's sale; the appellant by purchase under a subsequent constable’s sale. The pleadings need not be stated; no question is made upon them; they are sufficient to support the proper judgment, according to the facts found.

The special finding of the court, and the conclusions of the law thereon, are as follows:

“The plaintiff John G. Rgrry, on April 17th, 1877, recovered judgment in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Patton v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hays v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Cauble v. RymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Cooper v. HamIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. King's Administrator v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moslander v. Moslander's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Davis v. WattsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bristor v. BristorIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Scott v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Mays v. WadelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API