Legal Opinion

In re Hoover Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1943No. 4653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The Hoover Company, as assignee of Bernard C. Becker, deceased, has here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 20 to 23, inclusive, and 26 to 28, inclusive, of an application for a patent relating to a suction cleaner, such as a mechanical carpet sweeper, and particularly relating to an improved odorizer unit in such cleaner.

It is unnecéssary to discuss the invention or to set out the claims, since the sole ground of rejection of the claims was that of estoppel. The subject-matter of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells Cargo, Inc. v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Donald M. Woods v. William S. TsuchiyaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Mas v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  4. Sunbeam Corporation v. SW Farber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. Donald M. Woods v. William S. TsuchiyaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API