Legal Opinion
People v. Pacquette
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2015PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Pigott, J.
This appeal requires us to decide whether the People may be excused from their statutory requirement to notify a defendant, within 15 days of his arraignment, of their intention to offer at trial the testimony of a police officer who had previously identified him during a pretrial procedure (see CPL 710.30). We hold that the People were required to abide by the statutory notice requirement and therefore the court erred in allowing the officer to testify at trial relative to his identification of defendant. However, we find such error harmless.
L
On May 17, 2007, at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. ChicoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. ClayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. KerceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- CLAY, ERIC, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.