Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Kervin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1938No. 4 Div. 42Published

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Count 1 is in trespass to realty, the claimed damages consisting in large part of cutting the timber thereon. Count 2 seeks the statutory penalty for cutting trees.

Plaintiff owned one forty acres and defendant Davis the forty joining on the north. The real issue relates to the location of the boundary line. There was.verdict for plaintiff on count 1 with damages fixed at fifty dollars. Count 2 was therefore eliminated from the case, and needs no further consideration.

Plaintiff offered proof tending to show the old line, run some fifty years ago and known as the Michigan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Nolin v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Walters v. CommonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1835
  4. Lewen v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API