Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Richard Warren Fannon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 20, 2011No. 09–1492PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether a criminal defendant receives ineffective assistance of counsel when the defendant’s attorney fails to object after the State allegedly breaches its plea agreement with the defendant during the sentencing hearing. For the reasons expressed below, we answer in the affirmative. As a result, we vacate the defendant’s sentences and remand the case for resentencing before a different judge.

I. Factual and Procedural Background.

The State charged by trial information the defendant, Richard Fannon, with two counts of sexual abuse in the second degree…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. State v. BearseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. State v. HornessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Shaunta Rose HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Lee MadsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. State of Iowa v. Johnnathan Monroe FrencherCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  5. State of Iowa v. Andrew William SchlachterCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API