Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sherlock v. Stuart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1893Published

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel the issuance of a liquor license. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1DissentMcGrath, J.

This is an application to compel the mayor and city clerk of Grand Rapids to issue a license to carry on a saloon at No. 80 Waterloo street, in a block located on the corner of Waterloo and Monroe streets. Relator presented his bond to the common council, and that body approved it, and recommended that the license be granted. The mayor vetoed the action of the ■common council, giving as his reason that an application had been before made, by one Johnson, for a license to keep a saloon at 48 Monroe street (the Monroe street front of the same building), which called forth a remonstrance, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. In re FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Robison v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API