Legal Opinion
Kehm v. Continental Grain
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 5, 1987No. 86CA1741PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Melvin Kehm (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which awarded him benefits for permanent total disability, but denied additional benefits for permanent partial disability. We affirm in part and set aside in part.
Claimant sustained two compensable injuries, the first in June 1983 and the second in December 1983. He filed separate claims for workmen’s compensation benefits; however, the claims were adjudicated in a consolidated fashion at a single hearing.
The Panel concluded that each injury resulted in permanent partial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cabe v. SkeensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Benavides v. Edward C. Levy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- McGrath v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coates, Reid & Waldron v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Bowland v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Manor v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Vigil v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Howard University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.