Legal Opinion

Brown v. Lazarus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1893No. 239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Mary Brown, by this suit sought to recover, as sole heir of Patience Castleman, from appellees, who claimed under Michael D. and Andrew L. Castleman as the true heirs, the league of land in controversy, consisting of two tracts, situated, one in Wichita County and the other in Wichita and Archer counties.

The contention of appellant is, (1) that the proof of heirship offered by appellees, in so far as they sought to establish that those under whom they claimed were the true heirs of Patience Castleman, the common ancestor, by the declarations of Michael…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Schleicher v. MarkwardTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hancock v. Tram Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hickman v. GillumTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. McNeil v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lubbock Feed Lots, Inc., and Lockney Cooperative Gin v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re Estate of HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Aston Meadows, Ltd. v. Devon Energy Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Slaughter v. HightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API