Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Wade

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2008No. S-12437, S-12446PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Two tenants in common partitioned their property. After completing partition, they disagreed as to the amount of owelty 1 that was due. The superior court determined the amount owed, and one co-owner appeals, arguing that the superior court overvalued his property. The other co-owner cross-appeals, arguing that the superior court erred in (1) failing to designate a date for valuation of each pareel, (2) using an improper formula to determine owelty, (8) entering a money judgment in the final order, and (4) determining that appellant was the prevailing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Keenan v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Olivera v. Rude-OliveraAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Stacey Martin v. Christine LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  5. Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API