Keenan v. Wade
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Two tenants in common partitioned their property. After completing partition, they disagreed as to the amount of owelty 1 that was due. The superior court determined the amount owed, and one co-owner appeals, arguing that the superior court overvalued his property. The other co-owner cross-appeals, arguing that the superior court erred in (1) failing to designate a date for valuation of each pareel, (2) using an improper formula to determine owelty, (8) entering a money judgment in the final order, and (4) determining that appellant was the prevailing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Keenan v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Olivera v. Rude-OliveraAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Stacey Martin v. Christine LyonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Easley v. EasleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.