Legal Opinion

M.G. v. J.C.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 27, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, J.S.C.

This action for divorce raises a question never previously addressed by the Courts of New Jersey.

Is it a statutory violation for one spouse to tape his wife’s telephone communications from within the marital home? The utilization of telephone taping equipment in potential divorce scenarios has become more and more prevalent, and the efficacy of intra-spousal taping requires an analysis of the prevailing statute. N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-3 provides that:

“Except as otherwise specifically provided in this act, any person who: a. Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Leimgruber v. Claridge Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pascale v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  2. State v. LaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Bradley v. Atlantic City Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API