Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Parham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1968No. 535PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The sole question presented for decision on this appeal is: Did the trial court err in granting defendant’s motion for involuntary nonsuit at the close of all the evidence? This single question presents for consideration whether there was evidence of actionable negligence on the part of defendant and whether as a matter of law plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

This case has previously been before this Court on appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike the entire second and third further answers of defendant, and is reported in 269 N.C. 162, 152 S.E. 2d 117.

The duty that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Toohey v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. Everett v. . GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Jones v. . BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Stober v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Wood v. PostelthwaiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Schmidt v. OrtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Murphy v. PodgurskiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Moseley v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API