Thomas v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. April 29, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. “The court sustained defendant’s . . demurrer, but allowed plaintiff twenty days in which to amend her petition and meet this demurrer. To this ruling no exception was taken, nor is error assigned thereon in the bill of exceptions. Therefore, the ruling that the petition was subject to this . . demurrer became the law of the case. The plaintiff, within the twenty days allowed, filed a purported amendment to her petition. This amendment, however, . . clearly failed to meet the objections raised by the demurrer. No further amendment was offered within the twenty days allowed in the court’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooper v. Portner Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Neal v. MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Baker v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Train v. EmersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- White County Bank v. Clermont State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Bradshaw v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Cromer v. DinklerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Meeks v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.