Legal Opinion
Frank Leslie Holden v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 25, 1968No. 7012_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal from a conviction under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2812, raises several questions, all save one of which may be disposed of briefly.
Defendant Holden first urges that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and that his motion for judgment of acquittal should therefore have been granted. This assertion rests on the allegation that, although there was ample testimony that it was he who stole the car in Vermont, his subsequent association with it in Massachusetts was not sufficient to establish the “possession” required to give rise to an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- George C. Desmond, and v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- John Dececco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. John FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KlochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.