Legal Opinion

Rozelaar v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 23, 1925No. 2432PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal was invoiced in part as “necklets” and in part as “strings of beads.” It consists of beads of various materials strung on cotton strings of different lengths. The “necklets” and “strings of beads” were not marked, at the time of importation, so as to indicate the country of origin. They were marked while in customs custody, under the direction and supervision of the customs authorities and an additional duty of 10 per cent of the appraised value of the merchandise was assessed by the collector, in accordance with the provisions of section 304 (a) of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Lamport Export Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. EmrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API