Legal Opinion

Susan E. (Gerakaris) Robertson v. Andrew N. Gerakaris

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 9, 2015No. Aro-14-324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Andrew N. Gerakaris appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Caribou, Soucy, /.)• denying his motion to modify parental rights and responsibilities, granting two motions for contempt filed by Susan E. (Gerakaris) Robertson, and altering the parties’ schedule of parent-child contact. Gerakaris argues that the court abused its discretion and violated his due process rights by failing to recuse from the matter. In addition, he argues that the court erred or abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of the parties’ two younger children, denying his motion to modify, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Nadeau v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Sloan v. ChristiansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. Allan Rodgers v. Daniel KnightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Efstathiou v. EfstathiouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicky PYLE v. Robert PYLESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Todd E. Mathiesen v. Karie Ann (Mathiesen) MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Todd E. Mathiesen v. Karie Ann (Mathiesen) MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  4. Nicky Pyle v. Robert PyleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API