Legal Opinion

Todd E. Mathiesen v. Karie Ann (Mathiesen) Michaud

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 14, 2020PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision:

2020 ME 47

Docket: Aro-19-265 Argued: December 5, 2019 Decided: April 14, 2020 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HUMPHREY, JJ.* TODD E. MATHIESEN v. KARIE ANN (MATHIESEN) MICHAUD GORMAN, J. [¶1] Todd E. Mathiesen appeals from a judgment of divorce between the parties entered by the District Court (Fort Kent, Soucy, J.). Mathiesen argues that the court erred in denying his motion for recusal. We affirm the judgment. I. BACKGROUND [¶2] The following facts are undisputed. Mathiesen and Karie Ann (Mathiesen) Michaud were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. State v. RameauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. DeCambra v. CarsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. State of Maine v. Eric BardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. State v. BoyceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Todd E. Mathiesen v. Karie Ann (Mathiesen) MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API