Legal Opinion

RBC Aircraft Products, Inc. v. Precise Machining & Manufacturing, LLC

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 29, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-878 (SRU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR A NEW TRIAL AND RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW

STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.

On January 17, 2013, a jury returned a verdict finding that defendant Precise Ma*161chining and Manufacturing, LLC (“Precise”) breached a five-year requirements contract with plaintiff RBC Aircraft Products, Inc. (“RBC”).1 The jury awarded RBC $2,986,089 in compensatory damages. At the close of RBC’s case, Precise moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (doc. # 178). I…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Mary Ann Luciano v. The Olsten Corporation Frank N. Liguori Gordon J. Bingham Martin GelermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. This is Me, Inc. v. Elizabeth Taylor, Zev Bufman, and Zev Bufman Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Mark Boyce v. Soundview Technology Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Wit Capital Group, Inc.), Docket No. 05-1685-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RBC Aircraft Products, Inc. v. Precise MacHining & Manufacturing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API