Legal Opinion

United States v. Ward Richard McAlister

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1980No. 80-1016PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant was charged with a federal crime, trespass upon a nuclear plant site,1 having as its maximum penalty a $1000 fine. The district court granted the government’s Motion to Prohibit Jury Trial, ruling that the charged offense was “petty” and therefore outside the sixth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Pasco v. MacEWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Eichenlaub v. EichenlaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. United States v. Kenneth A. KozelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BrockDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API