Legal Opinion
Masiglowa v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 16, 1955No. Civ. No. 30076PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
Careful consideration has been given to the motion of the defendant railroad carrier to vacate and set aside the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court thereon and to grant the defendant a new trial.
The arguments and the briefs of the attorneys for both sides and the transcript of the testimony of the plaintiff, and of defendant’s eye-witness Dean F. Hackenburg, have been read and analyzed. The authorities cited in the briefs filed by the attorneys for the contending parties have been read and weighed. The conclusion has again been reached, announced at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Keith v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Wadiak v. Illinois Cent. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Hutchins v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morgan Yawn, Jr. v. Southern Railway Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Glass v. Birmingham Southern RR Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Olinski v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1956
- The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company v. Nick MasiglowaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956