Legal Opinion

Niepokoj v. Schulz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1987No. 64A03-8608-CV-240Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Leonard Niepokoj, Ruby Niepokoj, William O. Fifield, and Monda F. Sagalkin, (collectively referred to as Niepokoj) are the beneficial owners of an apartment complex held in trust. William H. Fifield (Fi-field), an attorney and chairman of Otto G. Fifield, Inc., a real estate sales and brokerage firm, represented Niepokoj in an attempted sale of the apartment complex. Niepokoj, Fifield and Otto G. Fifield, Inc., were held liable by the trial court for real estate commissions to Ann Schulz, the selling agent. We consider the following issue: Did Niepokoj's first counter offer,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. English Coal Co., Inc. v. DurcholzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State Security Life Insurance v. KintnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. GolzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Gerardot v. EmenhiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Ubelhor v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API