Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1959No. 8966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

An appeal from a judgment for specific performance of two alleged parol contracts, one for the sale of 10 acres of farm land and the other for exchange of 2254 shares of water stock.

William and Emeron Christensen are brothers and farmers, whose wives Celeste and Kathleen are also parties to this action.

In 1942 William and Emeron made a verbal contract to exchange land and shares of water stock. At that time William’s home was mortgaged to the Federal Land Bank of Berkley. Emeron orally agreed with William, to pay the mortgage, obtain a release thereof and the return of an executed deed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Frailey v. McGarryUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Clark v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Staley v. GrantUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Clark v. GeorgeUtah Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ferris v. JenningsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Holmgren Brothers, Inc. v. BallardUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Erickson v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Harding v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ewell and Son, Inc. v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API