Legal Opinion
Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 27, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 A.2d 196 (2004)
369 N.J. Super. 402
Kenneth THIEDEMANN, Plaintiff, and
Brian Flaherty and Barbara Flaherty, husband and wife, and Yuet Lan Lam, in their own right and as on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, f/k/a Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 3, 2004.
Decided May 27, 2004.
Peter Russell Kohn, Philadelphia, PA (Berger & Montague) of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Thomas J.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Dabush v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005