Legal Opinion

Cooper v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1969No. 4561PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, after waiving his demand for trial by jury, was tried and convicted by the trial judge of the charge of petit larceny. 1 Upon appeal, he alleges that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.

As the record before us was inadequate, we remanded the case to the trial court to determine the adequacy of appellant’s representation by appointed counsel. In compliance with our order, the court held a hearing which was attended by Government counsel, appellant’s trial attorney, and his attorney appointed by this court for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arthur Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. O'BRYANT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Grayson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Woody v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Barker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Fernandez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Herbert v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API